A Letter to English Language Teachers
A Letter to English Language Teachers

Dear Colleagues:
Dear Colleagues:
You have been honing on the linguistic needs of your non-native English-speaking students, helping them advance their reading, writing, listening, and speaking skills in the English language in the US and around the world. You empower your ESL students with your knowledge of syntax, phonology, morphology, semantics, and, hopefully, pragmatics. I
wanted to take this opportunity to share my thoughts on the pivotal role you play as educators in making your students informed global citizens.
Speaking
of the primary role of a university, India’s first Prime Minister Nehru
professed, “A university stands for humanism, for tolerance, for reason, for
the adventure of ideas, and for the search of truth. It stands on the onward march of the human
race towards even higher objectives. If
the universities discharge their duties adequately, then it is well with the
nation and the people.” I concur
wholeheartedly with Nehru's concept of a university and concur wholeheartedly with him that the classroom should be a place where creative ideas are
conceived, where our students learn lessons in tolerance, humility, and
cross-cultural awareness, where both faculty and students embark on the journey
of knowledge and wisdom by forging an intellectual alliance, where every individual is dedicated to the interactive
process of teaching and learning, and where our students become better
individuals by setting higher objectives for themselves.
English language programs must envisage pedagogy, which furthers these principles, fostering non-obtrusive
teaching styles through the following methodology. The educational institution offering English language courses invests authority in the
teacher to impart knowledge to adult language learners through a variety of
pedagogical techniques. The teacher
facilitates a conducive learning atmosphere by discouraging passive learning
styles and by encouraging active student participation. Curricular goals for each level of
proficiency are clearly defined and assist both the teacher and the students in
improving reading, writing, listening and speaking skills. Collectively, the teacher and the students
isolate and resolve linguistic insecurities, using a wide range of heuristic
aids.
The
great twentieth-century teacher, Gilbert Highet, once reasoned, “You must [be
able to] think, not what you know, but what they do not know; not what you find
hard, but what they will find hard; then, after putting yourself in their
minds, obstinate or puzzled, groping or mistaken as they are, explain what they
need to learn.” English language teachers
must continually strive to locate impediments to linguistic growth. I fervidly believe that complacency hinders professional
development. Therefore, vigilantly
breaking new ground, we must plumb the depth of the psychology of language
learning, constructing bold new sensitivities to unperceived and formerly
intractable problems of English language learning.
I wish you continued success in your professional endeavors and the patience to go through
the intellectual adventure with your colleagues and students. What you do as English language teachers at home and thousands of miles away from home makes a significant difference in your students' lives, as they gradually become proficient in the English language in addition to the linguistic system they have already acquired, and I salute your courage and perseverance.
Sincerely,
Jilani Warsi
Comments
Post a Comment