Peer Response Guidelines
Response
groups are emphatically not edit groups.
Peter Elbow distinguishes between criterion-based feedback and
reader-based feedback: the former is text-centered, evaluating content,
organization, diction, mechanics, and so forth; the latter is reader-centered,
recording personal reactions rather than judging. A guide for peer response groups might
include directions such as the following.
1.
Read the first one or two paragraphs of the draft and stop.
· What has the writer told you
so far?
· Based on what you’ve read so
far, what do you expect the rest of the essay to tell you?
· What’s your emotional
response to the writing so far: interest? sympathy? boredom? anger?
· What do you wish the writer
would do next?
2.
Read about halfway through the paper and stop again.
· Describe, in as much detail
as possible, what has been going through your mind as you read.
· Point out sentences or
passages that you especially liked as well as those that confused or annoyed
you.
· What do you expect in the
second half of the essay? What do you
want the writer to do?
3.
After reading the entire paper, follow the steps below.
· Briefly summarize the essay
as if you were describing it to a friend.
· Has your reaction to the
paper changed? How?
· What questions would you
like to ask the writer?
· What impression of the
writer do you get from the way she or he ends the paper?
· What metaphor or image would
you use to describe the essay (or the writer)?
[1]
Peer response guidelines are adapted from Peter Elbow, Writing with Power [New
York: Oxford University Press, 1981], pp. 255-263.
Comments
Post a Comment