Some Questions to Ask of Research Proposals
Some questions to ask of research proposals
Of the Introduction
Is the focus or purpose of the research stated clearly?
Does the problem statement appropriately restrict the
scope of the study?
Is the research question stated in succinct and
unambiguous terms?
Is the research question researchable?
Is there a theoretical or descriptive framework indicated
within which the question sits?
Is there a rationale for the study?
If relevant, are the researcher’s biases made clear?
Is the significance of the study made clear?
Of the Review of
the Research Literature
“In writing a research proposal,
the author is obligated to place the question or hypothesis in the context of
previous work in such a way as to explain and justify the decisions
made…Nothing more is appropriate and nothing more should be attempted…What is
it the author wants to know and why has this plan been devised to find the
answer? In a good review, the literature
is made to serve the reader’s query by supporting, explicating, and
illuminating the logic now implicit in the proposed investigation.” (Locke et
al., 1987)
Is the review introduced to let the reader know what to
expect?
Is the literature divided up into a number of
significantly different domains?
Are there secondary sources cited? Could they have been avoided?
Is there background research reported both in theory and
descriptive studies?
Is there a clear “gap” in the existing knowledge set out
that the research will address?
Is the literature logically reviewed as it relates to the
selection and significance of the questions?
Are the studies critically classified, compared, and
contrasted in terms of the way they contribute or fail to contribute to
knowledge relevant to the research question?
Is the review organized logically?
Are the assessments of the literature integrated?
Are there areas left out which should have been included?
Of the Research
Design
The primary purpose of this section is to convince the
reader that the study will be carried out competently and ethically with a high
probability that the data collect3ed, when analyzed, will provide a clear
answer to the research question.
Ideally, the methodology of the research should be presented in
sufficient detail to permit another to repeat the study in relevant details.
Is there a clear picture of the overarching design of the
research?
Is the type of study (e.g. correlational, experimental)
made explicit?
Is the methodology appropriate for the research question?
Is the logic of the procedure(s) clear and reasonable?
Is the time allotted to carry out the research reasonable?
If relevant, are the different types of variables clearly
defined?
Is there reason to believe that the research is qualified
to carry out the study?
Who are the subjects?
How do they participate in the study?
What instruments/tests were used?
What procedures of data collection will be utilized?
Are the methods of analysis clear?
Does the study meet ethical standards?
Of the
Findings/Results
Are the findings succinctly presented and organized in
terms of the question(s)?
Do they follow from the analysis in a coherent way?
Are they reasonable?
Were rival explanations considered and rejected?
Were confounding/complicating factors addressed and
accounted for?
If relevant, is the researcher’s biases/beliefs kept
distinct?
Of the Overall
Writing
Is the writing clear, succinct, and well-organized?
Is the audience for the proposal/report made clear?
Comments
Post a Comment