Age of Arrival
Length of
Residence and Age of Arrival
Causal Variables
Affecting Second Language Acquisition
Length of residence (LOR) is considered a singular criterion
for determining fossilization. Five years is usually considered the cut-off
point to determine whether learning has ceased.
Washburn’s (1991) study:
Learners who had lived in the target language community and
were exposed to reasonable amounts of L2 input were placed into two groups
“fossilized” and “non-fossilized.” Learners were given picture narration tasks
and their oral performance was assessed. Washburn concludes:
“On the short term learning task, the non-fossilized
subjects will learn (become able to learn) to produce the task utterance more
accurately and efficiently than the fossilized subjects, as measured by the
number of turns needed and the maintenance of accuracy of form.” (1991:78)
More evidence:
Flege’s (2001) study:
Flege studied different groups of Chinese adults who
differed in LOR to determine the role of input in facilitating successful
acquisition of a second language. The results of his study indicated that “the
lack of an effect of LOR in some previous studies may have been due to sampling
error. It appears that adults’ performance in an L2 will improve measurably
over time, but only if they receive a substantial amount of native speaker
input.” (2001: 527)
It is worth noting that LOR has often been used in
conjunction with age of arrival (AOL) to index L2 ultimate attainment and
age-related effects in second language acquisition. It is suggested that an English language program control these two causal variables and place English as a Second Language (ESL)
students in appropriate levels accordingly. An experimental study can be
designed based on the LOR and AOA criteria.
Comments
Post a Comment